Leadership is changing — quietly but profoundly. In a working world characterized by uncertainty, speed and growing complexity, it is no longer enough to control processes and delegate tasks. Modern leadership means creating relationships, providing security and creating spaces in which people can grow.
But what really defines a good manager today? And how can the quality of leadership be measured in everyday life?
More and more companies are faced with the challenge of not only describing their management culture, but also developing it in a targeted manner. They are looking for ways to make leadership visible, measurable and therefore also changeable — beyond individual training or pure gut feeling.
Mental Wellbeing Management is a central lever: Anyone who knows how secure a team feels, how strong the trust is, how well communication works — can steer leadership more precisely and promote it in a more targeted manner. Validated psychological assessments provide anonymized, evidence-based data that makes the invisible visible: tensions, strengths, irritations and resources in the system.
Leadership starts where people are heard — even when they're not speaking. This is exactly where mentalport's systemic approach comes in.
In many companies, the perception of leadership is still based on two deceptive indicators: formal position and subjective impression. Leaders are considered to be high-performing when they achieve their goals, their teams “function” and escalations are avoided. But what looks like efficiency can actually be a standstill — or worse: a psychologically stressful environment.
Because what is often missing in traditional HR logic is reliable insight into the “how” of leadership. How does a team feel led? Which communication patterns dominate? Is constructive feedback encouraged or avoided? Is there psychological safety — i.e. the confidence to be able to speak openly without having to fear negative consequences?
Many managers develop their style in self-affirmation mode: What is not reported back is considered approval. What is not addressed does not seem to exist. Employees who feel ignored, insecure, or controlled remain silent — out of fear, loyalty, or habit.
However, this “silent zone” creates considerable costs: psychological exhaustion, internal dismissal, hidden conflicts. Studies show that lack of leadership transparency is one of the most common drivers of turnover and performance slumps. Stable indicators often hide fragile realities.
This problem is particularly acute in hybrid or decentralized working models. Without direct contact, misunderstandings become the rule, lack of appreciation becomes the norm, and leadership becomes a phantom.
The result is a cultural dysfunction: employees are withdrawing, managers are groping in the dark and HR has no reliable data to intervene in a targeted manner. What's missing is visibility.
Modern leadership cannot only be improved through training or mission statements — it must be made visible. Only when managers understand how their communication works, how safe their team feels and what psychological tensions exist can they really learn, reflect and develop.
This is where a systemic mental wellbeing approach comes in. By using validated assessments — such as Team climate index, the Resilience radar, or the legally required GBU Psyche — can companies make leadership a tangible experience. Not through control, but through data-based transparency.
These methods measure, among other things:
The systemic nature of these analyses is particularly effective: The results are not personal, but capture dynamics, areas of tension and resources in the overall system. Managers receive anonymized feedback on areas that would otherwise remain hidden — without loss of face, but with concrete impetus for action.
An example: In a medium-sized technology company, as part of a mentalport assessment, it became clear that although regular formal meetings took place in several teams, these barely led to any real exchange. The team members did not feel heard, and feedback was seen as derogatory. The manager was surprised — she believed that she had already established a good feedback culture through an open-door policy and regular updates.
The data helped to open up a conversation about impact and perception. With the help of short micro-interventions, supported by the mentalport coaching app, targeted work was carried out on dialogue competence, active appreciation and clarity of expectations. After just three months, there was a significant improvement in team satisfaction, perceived fairness — and a measurable increase in performance.
This shows that leadership does not develop through more control, but through better understanding. And that starts with the right questions — asked in the right context, with the right methodology.
Perhaps the biggest challenge for leadership in today's working world is not change itself — but the invisibility of the conditions under which change happens. When organizations change, digitize, grow, or restructure, the psychological dynamics also change. Leadership is thus becoming a transformational skill. But how does transformation succeed if you don't know where you stand?
This is where data-informed leadership comes in: the ability to derive leadership behavior and psychological processes not from intuition or pure observation, but on the basis of measurable, continuously updated information. Executives then no longer act blindly, but with a precise picture of the situation — similar to a pilot with cockpit instruments, who detects turbulence early on and makes course corrections before damage occurs.
But what is the essence of such a tour?
It is not about KPI-driven management in terms of efficiency metrics or performance scores. The focus is on indicators of psychological safety, experienced sense of purpose, internal role clarity, team coherence and leadership effectiveness. With the right instruments, these “soft” factors can be translated into hard control variables.
A data-informed management model is based on three pillars:
Case study: A transformation project with profound impact
In an internationally active industrial company, a variety of processes were automated and restructured as part of a digitization initiative. The changeover was technically successful — but on an interpersonal level, there was a worrying increase in sick leave, tensions in project teams and the loss of several service providers.
It was only through a comprehensive GBU Psyche Assessment combined with cultural analysis modules that it became apparent what had a hidden effect: Managers felt under pressure, employees reported loss of control and ambiguity, and values such as trust and appreciation had suffered massively.
With the help of data-based leadership training, systemic coaching and targeted microinterventions, it was possible to address these patterns. The company introduced monthly pulse analyses, established dialogue formats between management and team — and within six months experienced a noticeable improvement in team satisfaction, a reduction in absenteeism and a measurable increase in psychological safety.
Conclusion:
Transformation does not succeed against people, but only with them. Managers who rely on data instead of assumptions can actively shape change — instead of managing it reactively. And companies that provide their managers with these management tools not only secure an advantage in the current transformation — but also in tomorrow's transformation
HR departments are facing a historic change of role today: away from an internal service provider to the strategic architect of a resilient, innovative organization. The key lies in their ability to systemically combine leadership, culture and mental stability — with the help of data-based, continuous analysis processes.
This role goes far beyond traditional personnel development. It comprises:
In this context, HR is becoming the central enabler of data-informed leadership. Instead of relying on individual measures, HR orchestrates systemic change — for example by introducing interactive dashboards that link team-related load data, sentiment indicators and early warning systems. This gives managers not only an overview, but also a “map of the load” with specific navigation aids.
Case study: From reporting to strategic management
For a long time, a medium-sized software company had only treated psychological stress reactively: When someone called in sick, they responded. The implementation of mentalport fundamentally changed the HR function: Through regular assessments, a central reporting dashboard and accompanying coaching impulses, stressed teams could be identified and supported at an early stage — before failures occurred.
The combination of team data and individual biofeedback analyses was particularly effective: This not only made it possible to identify that a team was strained, but also why — for example due to an excess of unclear roles or permanent conflicts of goals. From this, the HR department established new formats such as “clarity dialogues,” through which management and the team exchanged expectations, responsibilities and values in a structured manner. The result: Fewer conflicts, better retention, fewer absences.
HR is thus transformed from a personnel office into a control center for cultural resilience.
An organization's ability to deal with uncertainty does not primarily depend on its size or capital base — but on its internal resilience. And this is not created by technology or structures alone, but by psychological safety.
What does that mean in practice?
Psychological safety describes a working environment in which people can get involved without fear of negative consequences — with ideas, criticism, concerns, or mistakes. Studies by Amy Edmondson (Harvard Business School) show: In environments with a high level of psychological safety, the innovation rate is significantly higher, the error rate is lower, and the commitment is more stable.
But psychological safety doesn't happen by chance. It is the result of conscious design — through:
Instruments such as the GBU Psyche or further cultural analyses are not ends in themselves, but instruments for measuring the invisible. They make strained communication structures, lack of trust or latent toxic dynamics visible — and can therefore be changed.
Specific benefits:
An analysis of over 120 client companies, which Mentalport supported over 12 months, showed that the higher the perceived level of psychological safety (measured via standardized items on openness, error culture and involvement), the higher was employee retention and team coherence — regardless of industry or company size. This connection was particularly strong in change processes, such as reorganizations or growth spurts.
Psychological safety therefore not only has a preventive effect, but also a transformative effect: It makes organizations able to learn faster, more adaptive and at the same time more human — a decisive competitive advantage in an economy that is constantly reinventing itself.
Companies that refrain from systematically recording psychological burdens not only expose themselves to legal risks, but also ignore business-relevant effects. This is because psychological stress rarely manifests itself immediately — it has a creeping effect, often hidden in seemingly unspectacular indicators: increased absenteeism, falling performance, higher fluctuation or escalating conflicts within teams.
Particularly problematic: Many of these effects are wrongly attributed — for example due to lack of motivation, leadership failure or lack of skilled workers. The cause is often deeper: overburdening structures, conflicting role expectations, or a lack of psychological security. Without a valid database, interventions then often remain actionist or fizzle out of effect.
There is also a structural blind spot: Companies that do not analyze psychological stress can neither quantify their economic impact nor take targeted countermeasures. Studies show: According to the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), the costs of mental illness in the workplace amount to around 24 billion euros per year — due to production losses and absenteeism alone. The actual damage is likely to be much higher, as fluctuation, onboarding costs and quality losses are usually not taken into account.
A well-founded assessment such as GBU Psyche, supplemented by resilience, climate or cultural modules, creates transparency here. It makes it possible to localize sources of mental stress, to measure their effects and to set priorities in personnel and organizational development based on facts. In this way, prevention becomes a management tool — with immediate return on prevention.
In an increasingly complex world of work characterized by disruption, a company's human capital is becoming a critical success factor — not only in terms of innovative strength and productivity, but also in terms of organizational resilience. Against this background, HR management gains strategic relevance that goes far beyond traditional personnel administration. It becomes a design tool for sustainable value creation.
Central levers in this change are scientifically based, systematically implemented methods of psychological risk assessment (GBU Psyche). They make it possible to objectively identify mental load structures in a work context, analyze them and translate them into a continuous improvement process. The special feature: These assessments function not only as diagnostic tools, but also as an operational bridge between HR, occupational health and safety, and change management.
In particular, the structured procedure in accordance with the GDA guidelines — from risk analysis to evaluation of implemented measures — makes it possible not only to make mental burdens visible, but also controllable. This creates reliable control variables: e.g. psychological frictional losses in processes, early indicators of burnout risks or resilience factors in teams. These parameters can be converted into KPI structures that are compatible both for audits, ESG reporting and leadership development.
Overcoming organizational silos is particularly relevant: When HR, occupational safety, executive development and cultural work act on a joint, data-informed basis, synergy effects arise that previously seemed unachievable. Mental health thus becomes the main metastructure of a learning organization — with direct influence on fluctuation, productivity, employee retention and innovation rate.
The results speak for themselves: Companies that systematically analyze and intervene mental stress factors report significant improvements in the areas of employee satisfaction, team coherence and leadership effectiveness. GBU Psyche is thus developing from a legal obligation to a strategic investment in the future viability of the organization.
Digital transformation is not only changing processes, but also the inner rhythm of organizations. Hybrid work models, permanent availability, algorithmic control and consolidation of role profiles create new forms of psychological stress. Leadership is not devalued as a result, but radically redefined: It must provide orientation in uncertainty, promote trust in change and build collective resilience.
In this context, the ability to actively shape psychological safety gains strategic relevance. Managers are faced with the challenge of not only addressing mental health as an individual issue, but also as a systemic task — embedded in structures, processes and culture. Studies such as those by Edmondson (Harvard Business School) on the importance of psychological safety for high-performance teams or recent surveys by the Gallup Institute on employee retention show: Where mental security is lacking, performance, loyalty and innovative strength fall dramatically.
A professional GBU psyche creates an evidence-based basis here: It provides anonymized data on mental stress drivers in specific contexts — from team conflicts to unclear roles to excessive goals. In combination with accompanying assessments such as resilience or cultural analyses, an interactive, data-based management tool is created that enables organizations to manage precisely and effectively.
The goal is not control, but assumption of responsibility: Through tools such as mentalport, managers receive targeted feedback from the workforce, can validate measures and gradually create a climate in which trust, reflection and psychological safety are not only postulated but lived.
This is a key competitive advantage, particularly in the competition for skilled workers, in which purpose, health and development opportunities have become key decision parameters. Organizations that invest here are not only more resilient — they are more attractive, innovative and successful.
________________________
Continued support:
If you want to get a first idea of where your company currently stands, we offer you the opportunity to carry out a digital mental health audit free of charge and without obligation. This allows you to get a first impression of key fields of action within a few minutes — anonymous, privacy-compliant and scientifically based.
Feel free to start right at your own pace: https://management.mentalport.app/signup
On request, we will personally advise you on the implementation of the audit and on suitable assessments or workshop formats. Just write to us: hallo@mentalport.de or book a non-binding consultation.
Jetzt unverbindlich & kostenlos starten
