}

ISO 45003 and ESG — Why mental safety is becoming a strategic priority

Tim Kleber
Nov 2025

Mental health is no longer an individual issue — it is a central indicator of the future viability of modern organizations. In times of growing complexity, disruptive changes and increasing uncertainty, the mental well-being of employees is becoming more and more important. Companies that ignore psychological stress not only endanger the health of their employees, but also jeopardize their innovative strength, productivity and employer attractiveness.

With the international standard ISO 45003 For the first time, a globally recognized framework was created to systematically identify and manage psychosocial risks in a business context. This standard is not intended as an optional add-on, but addresses one of the most pressing challenges of modern occupational safety.

At the same time, mental health is increasingly becoming a central part of corporate sustainability. Through regulatory frameworks such as Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)Today, more than ever, organizations are required to transparently present and demonstrably improve the psychological well-being of their employees, the EU taxonomy or even industry-specific ESG ratings. This article shows what ISO 45003 specifically requires, how it is linked to ESG requirements and why their implementation can be a decisive competitive advantage.

1. What is ISO 45003? — The new standard for mental safety

ISO 45003 is the world's first international standard that is explicitly dedicated to managing psychosocial risks in the workplace. As an extension of the established occupational safety standard ISO 45001, it defines systematic requirements for promoting mental health within organizations for the first time. The aim is to provide companies of all sizes and industries with a clear framework for identifying, evaluating and effectively reducing psychological stress — such as stress, time pressure, lack of control, unclear roles, conflicts or lack of recognition.

The standard underlines that psychological stress must be treated just as seriously and in a structured manner as physical risks. This makes mental health an integral part of holistic occupational safety management systems. ISO 45003 obliges organizations to take the following measures, among others:

  • The integration of psychosocial risks into existing risk assessments under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (in particular §5 ArbSchG)

  • The introduction of policies and procedures to prevent and manage situations of psychological stress

  • Promoting an open, healthy corporate culture with a focus on trust, participation and psychological safety

  • Regular effectiveness review using qualitative and quantitative indicators

  • The active involvement of all employees — from top management to operational teams

For companies that are already certified according to ISO 45001, ISO 45003 offers a useful and seamless addition to expand the focus from purely physical to mental health aspects. It is therefore a decisive component for the further development of occupational health management towards holistic prevention.

2. ISO 45003 as a key to ESG compliance

In the context of ESG criteria — i.e. environmental, social and governance — environmental and climate protection were discussed primarily for a long time. But the “social” factor is rapidly gaining in importance: The way companies treat their workforce, how they promote equal opportunities, ensure security and protect mental health is increasingly decisive for investment decisions, partnerships and talents.

With the entry into force of the CSRD and the requirements for standardized, auditable sustainability reporting (e.g. in accordance with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards, ESRS for short), companies are also required to address mental health as a socially relevant issue. This requires not only qualitative declarations of intent, but reliable data, clear processes and transparent results.

This is where ISO 45003 comes in: It provides a methodologically sound framework for systematically identifying and evaluating psychosocial risks, deriving measures and evaluating their impact. Anyone who works in accordance with ISO 45003 can prove to regulatory authorities, investors, customers and employees that mental health is not random, but structured and strategically anchored.

At the same time, the company is positioning itself as a responsible employer — which not only strengthens ESG performance, but also contributes to attracting talent, retaining employees and reducing absenteeism. ISO 45003 is therefore much more than a standard: it is a strategic tool for sustainable corporate management in the 21st century.

3. What does ISO 45003 specifically require of companies?

ISO 45003 is not a technocratic set of rules — it aims at a deeper transformation of corporate culture and management responsibility. The requirements can be divided into five central pillars of action, the implementation of which is intended as a continuous improvement process.

  1. Understanding the organizational context: Organizations should systematically analyze which internal and external factors influence psychosocial risks. These include digital transformation processes, new forms of work (e.g. remote work), management structures, corporate culture and socio-demographic characteristics of the workforce. This situational understanding forms the basis for every further measure.
  2. Involvement and participation: Participation is a central element of ISO 45003. Affected employees and their interest groups must be actively involved in designing analysis and intervention measures. This ranges from the selection of suitable survey tools to the joint prioritization of priority areas for action. Participation not only increases acceptance, but also the validity of the results.
  3. Systematic risk assessment: Carrying out a psychological risk assessment is at the heart of the standard. Work-related stress factors as well as structural tensions, organizational changes or interpersonal conflicts should be taken into account. ISO 45003 requires that qualitative and quantitative methods be combined — such as standardized employee surveys, focus groups, interviews, or structured observations.
  4. Derivation of targeted measures: Measures must be evidence-based, scalable and anchored on multiple levels. ISO 45003 specifically names the individual level (e.g. coaching, stress management training), the team level (e.g. conflict moderation, role clarification) and the organizational level (e.g. process optimization, cultural development). An isolated measure unrelated to the system is considered insufficient.
  5. Evaluation and continuous improvement: Effectiveness must be made measurable. Here, the standard requires the introduction of indicators — such as participation rates, satisfaction scores, health indicators or qualitative feedback. What is important is that the measures must not remain unique, but must be regularly evaluated, adjusted and updated. The aim is a learning system.

These five dimensions are not a checklist, but an integrated framework for action. Companies that seriously implement ISO 45003 are shifting their perspective: from pure risk prevention to active health promotion as part of a sustainable corporate culture.

4. Implementation challenges — and how to overcome them

The practical implementation of ISO 45003 poses numerous challenges — particularly for companies that have not yet established a structured approach to mental health. There is often a lack of appropriate processes, responsibilities and methodological clarity. The following is an overview of key hurdles and practical solutions:

Lack of internal capacity: In many organizations, HR, BGM or EHS teams are at the limit in terms of personnel. New tasks in the area of mental health meet overburdened structures. This is where external solutions such as digital platforms or specialized providers help, which complement and relieve existing processes.

Methodological uncertainty: Many companies are only vaguely aware of the psychological risk assessment. Inappropriate methods are often chosen — such as pure questionnaires or even workplace visits — that are not GDA-compliant. However, ISO 45003 requires a systematic, valid and participatory approach. Providers such as mentalport offer standardized, validated processes that meet these requirements — completely digital and in compliance with data protection regulations.

Privacy and anonymity: Trust is the basis of successful psychological risk assessments. Many employees fear traceability or negative consequences. A technical infrastructure that guarantees complete separation of account and personal data is all the more important — ideally with server locations in Germany or the EU. Platforms such as mentalport come in right here by providing anonymized access via a web app, which can be supplemented by a mobile coaching app if desired.

Fragmented processes: There are often no connections between risk assessment, occupational safety measures, coaching offers and reporting. However, ISO 45003 requires a continuous combination of analysis, intervention and evaluation. This is exactly what modern mental health management platforms enable, which automatically map and document this process chain.

Lack of anchoring in management: Mental health is often viewed as an HR or BGM issue, not as a strategic management task. The result: insufficient budget, lack of objectives and low visibility. ISO 45003 provides clear guidelines for how mental health must be systematically integrated into management and decision-making processes — from risk analysis to impact monitoring.

The solution lies in an integrated approach that combines analysis, implementation of measures, communication and evaluation. For the first time, digital solutions such as mentalport make this possible in an efficient and scalable way — from GBU Psyche to individual coaching measures to ESG-compliant reporting at the push of a button.

5. From duty to opportunity: Using mental health strategically

What appears at first glance to be an additional regulatory burden is revealed upon closer inspection as a strategic lever for companies. The implementation of ISO 45003 can become a real differentiator — both vis-à-vis investors and on the labor market.

A well-implemented mental health strategy not only reduces absenteeism and fluctuation, but also demonstrably increases the innovative strength, resilience and satisfaction of employees. Studies show that companies with a positive mental health culture are three times more successful than their competitors — measured in terms of productivity, employee retention, and financial performance.

There is also the direct monetary effect: According to recent analyses, companies in Germany lose an average of around 9,000€ per employee and year due to mental stress — caused by presentism, absenteeism, fluctuation and reduced productivity. This amount alone justifies a structured approach.

In the age of ESG, mental health is becoming a real value driver. Organizations that assume responsibility today will be credible, resilient and sustainable players on the market tomorrow — with satisfied employees, strong teams and clear competitive advantages.

6. Conclusion: ISO 45003 as a bridge between health and governance

ISO 45003 is much more than a guideline — it is a strategic tool for modern corporate management. It combines legal requirements with sustainability, prevention with productivity and individual health with collective performance.

By combining standards-based procedures, digital solutions such as mentalport and an open management culture, companies can establish holistic mental health management that is not only compliant with regulations, but also has a real impact — for people, organizations and society.

Whoever acts now is not only investing in the health of employees, but also in the future viability of the company.

Jetzt unverbindlich & kostenlos starten

Dein Weg zum Mental Wellbeing Management

Abonniere unseren Newsletter
Dankeschön! Deine Einreichung ist eingegangen!
Huch! Beim Absenden des Formulars ist etwas schief gelaufen.